Brittney Griner has finally spoken out regarding the recent controversy involving Caitlin Clark, firmly denying any use of inappropriate language directed at her fellow athlete. Griner emphasized that she would never use such words, calling out the misinformation and rumors that have been circulating online. By addressing the issue directly, Griner aims to set the record straight and remind fans of the importance of honesty and respect in women’s basketball.

Posted by

“Would never say that. Like, there’s no place for that in our league.”

Atlanta Dream center Brittney Griner (42) celebrates a play with guard Allisha Gray (15) during the third quarter against the Washington Mystics at CareFirst Arena.
Credit: Rafael Suanes-Imagn Images
Brittney Griner’s Atlanta Dream faced off against Caitlin Clark’s Indiana Fever in late May, with the Dream ultimately winning 81-76.

Atlanta center Brittney Griner, in her first season with the WNBA club, had five fouls when she re-entered the game with four minutes remaining and the Fever leading by three. She was soon called for her sixth foul on what one Peachtree TV announcer called a “ticky-tack” foul on Fever forward Natasha Howard. The center appeared visibly frustrated as she huddled with her teammates on the floor before leaving the game.

2 Americans in London on why they’re joining the ‘No Tyrants’ movement

Griner returned to the bench, where cameras caught her talking in frustration, although there was no audio. It appeared that she said “f*cking trash” before saying something that certain people interpreted as “f*cking white girl.” The presumption among those people was that Griner was referring to Clark, which didn’t make much sense as she was not involved with the offending play.

The clip of Griner speaking on the bench, lacking any context, spread on social media and went viral via several conservative-leaning media outlets and personalities. In a back-and-forth with Fox-owned OutKick’s Riley Gaines, Jemele Hill said that she thought Griner had said “f*cking wack call,” which would make a lot more sense given the context.

However, that didn’t satisfy conservative outlets who smelled blood. Being able to prove that Griner, who was already disliked in those circles due to the saga surrounding her Russian detainment, had said something offensive about Clark, whom they had turned into an avatar of white grievance, seemed like a content goldmine.

Fox-owned OutKick has been leading the charge on this topic in the weeks since. The site finally got its opportunity Sunday when reporter Dan Zaksheske had the chance to speak with Griner before the Dream’s 89-56 win over the Washington Mystics.

Griner told the reporter that she remembered the play where she fouled out but couldn’t remember what she said on the bench afterward.

“I remember fouling out, being mad,” Griner said. “I really can’t remember what I said, honestly.”

Zaksheske offered Griner the chance to see the video, but she told him that it wouldn’t help her decipher it.

After the game, he caught up with the Dream’s star center once more and asked more specifically if she might have said ‘f-ing white girls’ at that moment.

“No,” responded Griner. “Would never say that. Like, there’s no place for that in our league. I wouldn’t say that. I was mad about the call.

“I know it wasn’t that because I wouldn’t use that type of language.”

So there you go. Griner was adamant that she didn’t say what certain people think she said. That doesn’t align with the narrative that has been created about her, so it’s likely that her authentic response won’t change much in the eyes of those who seek a different answer.

 

News

Snoop Dogg: A Heart of Compassion and a Legacy of Love for Rescue Animals

In the world of fame and fortune, where the spotlight often shines on the flashy and the extravagant, stories of…

GREAT NEWS: Karmelo Anthony WILL FACE THE D3ATH PENALTY! 👇

 In a stunning turn of events, the Collin County Grand Jury has indicted 17-year-old Karmelo Anthony for the m::urder of…

Jim Jordan’s “Born in the USA” Bill Could Redefine Who’s Allowed to…

Jim Jordan’s “Born American Act” Sparks National Debate Over Eligibility, Identity, and American Values WASHINGTON, D.C. — In a move…

BREAKING: Melissa Gorga has caused a major stir after declaring she would boycott the Super Bowl if organizers still allow Bad Bunny to perform at the halftime show.

The Super Bowl is still months away, but the halftime drama has already begun — and this year, it’s not…

“ENOUGH IS ENOUGH – P.AY NOW!” – Barbra Streisand Sues Karoline and Network for $60 M.illion After E.xplosive On-Air Clash.

Barbra Streisand Files $60 Million Lawsuit After Explosive On-Air Clash! In a shocking turn of events, legendary singer and actress Barbra…

Bakery Worker Spots 4 Abandoned Children Outside His Shop – What He DiscoaBakery Worker Spots 4 Abandoned Children Outside His Shop – What He Discovers Up Close Leaves Him Stunnedvers Up Close Leaves Him Stunned The morning started like any other in Burlington, Vermont. The January frost clung stubbornly to the sidewalks, the air carrying the sharp bite of winter. Michael Reed, a dedicated baker and owner of a small shop called Dulce Esperanza, unlocked his door at dawn, ready to prepare trays of bread that would fill the air with warmth and comfort. But on this particular morning, Michael’s routine collided with fate. At the threshold of his bakery sat a crumpled cardboard box. And inside it—huddled, shivering, and red-cheeked from the cold—were four abandoned children. The Shocking Discovery Michael’s breath caught as he knelt. The eldest, a girl of about ten, clutched a toddler against her chest. Two boys, both younger, pressed into her sides for warmth. Their clothes were far too thin for the bitter winter. The girl’s eyes lifted, wide with fear. “Please,” she whispered, “don’t send us away.” At that moment, Michael didn’t think twice. He opened his door wide. “No, sweetheart. You’re safe here. Come in.” Inside the bakery, the children were wrapped in blankets, warmed with mugs of milk, and given pastries fresh from the oven. But as Michael studied their tattered clothes, he noticed something unsettling—strange stitched symbols on their sleeves, triangular shapes with cryptic letters. When he asked, the girl stiffened. “Don’t touch it,” she warned. “They’ll come.” Her words haunted him. Who were “they”? Why were abandoned children marked like this? Calling for Help Michael’s first thought was to call child services, but the sheer terror in the girl’s eyes stopped him. He knew the system might provide food and shelter, but what these children feared went beyond ordinary abandonment. By midmorning, customers were already eyeing the children curiously. Uneasy, Michael stepped outside and pulled out his phone. There was only one person he trusted with something this delicate: Isabelle Carter, a police officer—and his childhood friend. When Isabelle arrived, her gaze went straight to the stitched markings. Her expression hardened. “Michael,” she said, lowering her voice, “this isn’t random. I’ve seen those symbols before. They’re linked to trafficking networks.” Michael’s stomach sank. These weren’t just abandoned children—they were victims of something far darker. Danger Enters the Bakery The bell above the bakery door chimed. A man in a dark coat stepped in, pretending to browse the shelves. But his eyes locked immediately on the children. Lucy, the eldest, clutched her siblings tighter. The man, who introduced himself as James, ordered coffee he never touched. His gaze never strayed from the children’s corner. When he finally left, Isabelle leaned in, whispering urgently: “That man isn’t a customer. I’ve seen him during investigations. He’s connected to these rings.” From that moment, Michael’s bakery became something else—not just a safe haven but a battleground. Turning a Bakery into a Fortress That night, Michael locked the doors early, pulling shades over the windows. He called his best friend, Thomas, a delivery driver known for his no-nonsense toughness. “You can’t take these guys on,” Thomas warned. “But you can’t hand the kids back, either. We’ll watch the place together.” They began shifts, keeping the bakery under guard day and night. The children slowly began to open up. Lucy revealed they had been taken from different towns and kept in a warehouse. The marks on their clothes were identifiers, brands that traffickers used to claim “ownership.” She spoke of other kids still trapped there, her voice trembling. Michael’s heart ached. These weren’t just abandoned children—they were survivors. And they needed more than bread and warmth; they needed justice. Escalation James returned. Sometimes alone, sometimes with men waiting outside on the street. One evening, he leaned close to Michael, voice cold: “These kids don’t belong to you. Mind your business, or someone gets hurt.” But Michael was stubborn. He wasn’t giving up. Days turned into a blur of tension. Every creak of the door sent adrenaline surging. Yet inside the bakery, amidst the fear, moments of humanity emerged. The boys began laughing again. The toddler giggled when Michael dusted flour on his nose. Lucy helped roll dough, her small hands trying to mimic his movements. For the first time, they were children again—not property. The Breaking Point Two nights later, James returned with two men and tried to break in. Michael and Thomas fought desperately to hold the door while Isabelle rushed backup to the scene. Sirens finally sent the traffickers scattering, but the message was clear—they weren’t stopping. That night, Lucy made a decision. Sitting at the bakery table, her voice shaking but resolute, she told Isabelle about the warehouse near the river. The place she and the others had been kept. “Please,” she begged, “save the rest of them.” The Raid At dawn, police stormed the warehouse. The reports that followed were harrowing: cages, filthy mattresses, and terrified children—dozens of them. James and his men were caught trying to flee. The evidence was undeniable. For Michael, waiting back at the bakery with Lucy and her siblings, the hours felt endless. When Isabelle finally returned, her voice was firm but her eyes glistened. “We got them. The children are safe.” Michael nearly collapsed in relief. But Isabelle corrected him gently: “It wasn’t me. It was Lucy. Her courage gave us the key.” Aftermath The case dominated headlines. James and his accomplices were sentenced to decades in prison. The network unraveled, freeing children who might otherwise have disappeared forever. For Michael, the hardest part came afterward—saying goodbye. Lucy clung to him. “I don’t want to leave. You made me feel safe.” He hugged her tight. “You’ll always have a home here. Don’t forget that.” A week later, he received a letter in careful handwriting: “Thank you for saving us. I’ll come back one day, I promise.” A Bakery Transformed Standing inside Dulce Esperanza, Michael realized the bakery was no longer just a business. It had become a place of hope. A place where kindness defied cruelty, and where four abandoned children had found safety when they needed it most. Every time he looked at the corner where the box once sat, he remembered the truth he had lived: sometimes, doing the right thing means opening your door—even when danger waits outside. Conclusion: The Lesson of the Abandoned Children Stories like these remind us of something profound. It’s easy to think one person can’t make a difference. Michael was just a baker. Yet his decision to act—to welcome four abandoned children into his shop—helped dismantle a network of exploitation. Love and courage often start small, like warm bread shared on a cold morning. But they ripple outward, changing lives in ways no one could have predicted. And for Lucy and her siblings, what began in fear outside a bakery ended in freedom—because one man refused to close his door. This story draws inspiration from real-life people and events, but has been adapted with fictional elements for storytelling purposes. Names, characters, and specific details have been altered to respect individuals’ privacy and to enhance the narrative experience. Any similarities to actual persons, living or deceased, or real events are entirely coincidental and unintended. The author and publisher do not guarantee the factual accuracy of the events or character portrayals, and accept no responsibility for any misinterpretations. The content is presented “as is,” and all views expressed belong solely to the fictional characters, not the author or publisher.

Bakery Worker Spots 4 Abandoned Children Outside His Shop – What He Discovers Up Close Leaves Him Stunned The morning…

End of content

No more pages to load

Next page